AHP, Blog Post, Occupational Therapy, RCOT, Recovery

What is #rehabilitation, why is it so hard to define and do we need to define it? 

Acknowledgment – This blog post is a personal opinion piece, based on thoughts and ideas about my own lived experience, writing is an occupation that helps me make sense of my thoughts and ideas. I acknowledge these may not be shared others, and respect peoples rights to have, different even conflicting ideas.  This website has an accessible feature, that allows different accessible formats by simply clicking on a button labelled ‘Accessibility Menu’ that appears in green on all pages. It will provide you with a number of options to change the appearance to meet your accessibility needs.  This communication has been written by a dyslexic person. If you have any trouble with the meaning of any of the sentences or words, please do not be afraid to ask for clarification. I’m #MadeByDyslexia – expect creative thinking & creative spelling.

This week at work, I attended a two day event to look at the provision of mental health rehabilitation services that the trust I work for provides and how we might redesign it as part of the national driver of community transformation expected within all NHS mental health service providers.  

In a nut shell community transformation is about dramatically changing how services are run by braking down barriers to care, by removing criteria and long referral processes.  A service that meets the needs of the individual rather than the individual having to fit in to the narrow criteria of a service. 

Brilliant, just the sort of service I have talked about when reflecting on my own journey of recovery.  

Changing cultures are hard, and perhaps although a lot of difficulties with poor practice that dehumanises people still remain within institutional services.   Mental health and learning disabilities organisations and national drivers are ahead of the curve when it comes to progressing towards services that meet the needs of people.   

Why might this be?  

For me it’s a move towards, co-creation, recovery focused and inclusive practices that don’t just listen to stories of lived experiences,  but actively invites it in to work for the organisations and develop alongside traditional health and care professionals changes in culture, and service delivery.  

Something NHS services, delivering physical health services and local authorities that provide social care need to embrace.  

So at this event there was a mixture of health professionals working within the current rehabilitation service, like nurses, health care assistants, psychologists, occupational therapists, peer support workers,  experts by experience, managers, service leaders, etc..

Our first task was to define rehabilitation. What it is, how it is different from other services offered by the trust. In essence the unique selling point.  

This blog will focus on this question as perhaps you might be surprised how difficult a group of people who have worked in or received care from rehabilitation services found it so hard to define.  

Where to start? 

Perhaps with the general population understanding of rehabilitation or rehab as it is often referred to.  Like me your first thought might be of the Amy Winehouse song Rehab and the lines ‘They tried to make me go to Rehab, but I said no, no, no’

We often hear of celebrities attending ‘Rehab’ for addiction issues,  so it’s easy to understand when you might start talking to a person about getting some rehab,  they might be confusion if an addiction to substances is not a priority concern or not apparent at all.  

But when you add another word for context it becomes more understandable.  

  • Nero rehabilitation (which was the rehab I have personally experienced) 
  • Mental health rehabilitation 
  • Physical Rehabilitation
  • Vocational Rehabilitation 
  • Cognitive Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation Therapy.  

So what are the origins of the word?  

The noun rehabilitation comes from the Latin prefix

 “re” meaning “again” and “habitare” meaning “make fit.” 

Dictionary definitions 

plural rehabilitations

  • the action, process, or result of rehabilitating or of being rehabilitated: such as a restoration especially by therapeutic means to an improved condition of physical function 
  • the process of restoring a person to a drug- or alcohol-free state
  • the process of restoring someone (such as a criminal) to a useful and constructive place in society
  • the rehabilitation of prisoners
  • the restoration of something damaged or deteriorated to a prior good condition the rehabilitation of the neighbourhood the rehabilitation of a person’s reputation

How do other organisations define rehabilitation? 

The World health organisation says Rehabilitation is defined as “a set of interventions designed to optimise functioning and reduce disability in individuals with health conditions in interaction with their environment”.

From NHS England’s guide on commissioning rehabilitation. A modern healthcare system must do more than just stop people dying. It needs to equip them to live their lives, fulfil their maximum potential and optimise their contribution to family life, their community and society as a whole. Rehabilitation achieves this by focusing on the impact that the health condition, developmental difficulty or disability has on the person’s life, rather than focusing just on their diagnosis. It involves working in partnership with the person and those important to them so that they can maximise their potential and independence, and have choice and control over their own lives. It is a philosophy of care that helps to ensure people are included in their communities, employment and education rather than being isolated from  the mainstream and pushed through a system with ever-dwindling hopes of leading a fulfilling life.

What about occupational therapy and rehabilitation?  

In 2020 the royal college of occupational therapists (RCOT) ran events called the Big Rehab Conversations to help them develop best practice for rehabilitation, identify the challenges and ensure the advice they offer reflects what’s actually happening on the ground.

Within the RCOT Informed View – mental health rehabilitation it is argued that 

The term ‘rehabilitation’ can be problematic within the mental health sector, as it is typically associated with complex rehabilitation for people with psychosis, delivered in tertiary services. This means occupational therapy delivered in wider mental health services, such as community teams, is not commonly framed as rehabilitation.

As a broad term, the aim of rehabilitation is to maximise people’s ability to live, work and learn. Occupational therapy interventions focus on helping people to achieve these goals to the best of their potential. This aligns with a recovery approach in adult mental health services and a reablement approach within older people’s mental health services.

Occupational therapists are underrepresented within multidisciplinary mental health teams. Where roles do exist, capacity to offer rehabilitation may be diluted by generic responsibilities.

Across the UK there is a renewed focus on the best way to deliver rehabilitation. This requires innovative new approaches and service redesign, co-produced and co-delivered with people who access services. This offers a unique opportunity for occupational therapists to influence development and implementation.

They go on to state occupational therapist need to lead mental health rehabilitation reform with a focus on meaningful occupations, ensuring people keep links with local employment and education, manage daily living and social skills, and take part in leisure and community activities. It is fundamental that rehabilitation is person and occupation focused and that services address environmental, social and economic need.

https://www.rcot.co.uk/files/rcot-informed-view-mental-health-rehabilitation-april-2022pdf

Of course this is a statement i’m going to agree with because occupational therapy is my bread and butter and anything that helps occupational therapy being seen as a treatment tool rather than the name of a profession is always going to be helpful,  but there is a need to look at what resources are available and what other skills other professions can bring,  for me its more about having an approach to rehab that is important one that has a common way of working with people, rather than doing things for people.  

If rehabilitation is about the person do we need to define it?  

Is it the complexity of a persons needs, and the goals they want to accomplish that is the essence of rehabilitation?  

When I reflect on my own lived experience of rehab it wasn’t focused on my goals but a set of expectations, expectations I would walk again, when that expectation took longer than expected, services were at a loss of what to do!  

At times it felt like they had given up.   

My goals and wants were thought about to an extent but not explored, not set out as a goal to work towards.  Walking again, was never my priority.  I got there, but only when I was allow to hold the rains myself and seek support privately that my goals were really addressed.  

  • Finding passion again
  • Sharing my thoughts 
  • Writing 
  • Doing art,
  • Being a wife and not a person who needed constant caring for 
  • Enjoying life 
  • Getting back to work  

Washing myself, dressing my self, feeding myself were needs but not priorities for me.  They were met in a way that was satisfying to me.  

That’s rehabilitation to me, finding away through what is difficult to be the person I wanted and do the things I wanted, that make my life fulfilling.  

By the end of the two day event, we have created an outline of a new model of delivering rehabilitation,  but i’m not sure we were able to define it in a way that was agreeable, and maybe that’s the point?  

References

A professional’s guide to functional rehabilitation – The OT Practice

Rehabilitation

https://www.etymonline.com/word/rehabilitation

rehab | Etymology, origin and meaning of rehab by etymonline 

Rehabilitation Definition & Meaning – Merriam-Webster

Defining rehabilitation: An exploration of why it is attempted, and why it will always fail – PMC

(PDF) What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description

https://www.physio-pedia.com/An_Overview_of_Rehabilitation_for_Nurses

Ableism, AHP, Blog Post, Occupational Therapy, RCOT

Let’s encourage an inclusive culture of understanding by using words. – Why we should stop using acronyms, and why occupational therapist should be leading the way.  #EncourageInclusiveCultures  #UseTheWords

Acknowledgment – This blog post is a personal opinion piece, based on thoughts and ideas about my own lived experience. I acknowledge these will not be shared others, and respect peoples rights to have, different even conflicting ideas.  This website has an accessible feature, that allows different accessible formats by simply clicking on a button labelled ‘Accessibility Menu’ that appears in green on all pages. It will provide you with a number of options to change the appearance to meet your accessibility needs.  This communication has been written by a dyslexic person. If you have any trouble with the meaning of any of the sentences or words, please do not be afraid to ask for clarification. I’m #MadeByDyslexia – expect creative thinking & creative spelling.

Acronyms – an abbreviation formed from the initial letters of other words and usually pronounced as a word.  

Acronyms are common place in most lines of work, particularly in health and social care, but in the interest of fostering inclusive cultures,  should we remove the use of acronyms altogether?  

Acronyms are useful, they save us time.  Good practice when using them in a document is to write out the full meaning first followed by the acronym. However this often does not happen, or they are so commonly used in some settings that the words they stand for are hardly used, sometimes becoming only known as the acronym.  

This can create problems with clear communication and levels of understanding for a number of reasons, 

  • Acronyms can often be a barrier to those not ‘in the know’. 
  • Levels of embarrassment about asking or a concern you may be considered ignorant leads to avoidance in asking.
  • Communicating effectively to others that don’t work in the same field can become difficult
  • Sometimes acronyms can mean different things to different groups or can stand for more than one thing. 
  • Those who are neuro-divergent, often find following the flow difficult when acronyms are used.
  • Sometimes making acronyms can create odd or funny words. 
  • We can become complacent, forgetting to explain terms to people accessing the services we provide. 

Detailed below are some examples from personal experiences;

A great example of an acronym that means more than one thing is OT.  This stands for both occupational therapy and occupational therapist,  often the context of the rest of the sentence might give a clue as to which term is being referred to, but it can also mean people aren’t sure.  

Recently I was involved in a project updating a resource in the national health service (NHS) trust I work for, and a senior occupational therapist asked if RCOT stood for royal college of occupational therapy or therapist.  They were so used to just hearing RCOT that despite being a member for many years, found themselves asking the question.  

My job title is lead occupational therapist –  When I was once talking to a police officer as part of my role he said to me so you’re a LOT? and giggled to himself.  

Often titles of meetings as referred to as their acronyms,  My diary is now full of them, PIPA, OTLGN, DDTV, LTHC to name but a few, often these meetings are just referred to as their acronyms,

Within an occupational therapy meeting I attend last month, I kept hearing the term ATR, later after asking for clarity,  it meant activity through recovery –  a book I know well, but never heard it referred to as an acronym,  perhaps evidences that we can create a quick and easy language for ourselves, that excludes new people. 

There are lots of other acronyms the occupational therapy profession, they become second nature, but aren’t easily understood by other professions, or our clients.    

for example: AHP, MOHO, MOHOST, VDTMoCA, AMPs, LCALS, SAP, OTA. 

Often it is said that occupational therapy is poorly understood,  surely we are not helping this when not fully explaining what we mean?  

For example, saying I have completed a MOHOST in a multidisciplinary team meeting, could be meaningless to other professions,  but saying I have completed a model of human occupation screening tool,  gives some context that could be understood at some level.  There is another common tool used within mental health settings MHOST (Mental Health Optimal Staffing Tool) using both has often course confusion. 

I’m a public governor for a local acute national health services trust, despite working for a mental health national health service trust for 20 years.  I’m coming across acronyms I am unfamiliar with as they are not commonly used in my area of work.  I’m having to ask constantly what something stands for, sometimes I can work it out, but I now always ask to make sure I understand, often other governors  thank me for asking.  

Today I held some interviews for some newly qualified occupational therapists, in the part where candidates can ask us questions, one person asked what the acronyms on the front of the job description meant.  The job description is a generic one for band 5 occupational therapists within the trust so on the front is has acronyms related to the different specialities AMH, MHSOP, CYPMHS, LD.  We are so used to using these acronyms within the trust,  we don’t even explain them on a job description for newly qualified staff that might be totally new to the field.  

I’m dyslexic and have long covid, both create difficulty with processing skills, often when I say acronyms out loud I get the letters muddled. For example CPD and CBT. I know the meaning of both, but because they are so similar my brain muddles them up.  I find saying the words stops this from happening.  

Continuing Professional Development,  

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy.   

When I hear another person saying acronyms out loud, my brain takes a little longer to process that information and recall the meaning, at times I lose the flow of the topic because my brain focuses on remembering what the acronym stands for, or wonders what it means and I get lost. 

I have lots of experiences of asking for clarity from colleagues, and having a response of annoyance that I asked, being told ‘I’m not going to explain that to you,’ or eyes rolled at me.  This used to make me not speak up, not contribute to meetings, in fear of being thought of as foolish or not worthy of my role.  However what I have learnt is that this sort of behaviour is not an inclusive way of working, it shows ignorance of others diverse needs and can be interpreted as ableist.   It’s that persons problem not mine and at least I am clear in what was meant and feel better informed.   

There has been times when people have kindly offered to make a crib sheet for me that includes common acronyms,  this although meant well, is ableist it could be interrupted as I hear you have a difficultly  but I’m not willing to change my pattern of behaviour, you need to conform to neurotypical ways of working.  





The health and care professions council (HCPC) have revised their standards of proficiency for registrants, they have significantly expanded the role of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI), placing specific importance on making sure that practice is inclusive for all service users. Registrants must:

  • 5: recognise the impact of culture, equality and diversity on practice and practise in a non-discriminatory and inclusive manner
  • 5.1: respond appropriately to the needs of all different groups and individuals in practice, recognising this can be affected by difference of any kind including, but not limited to, protected characteristics, intersectional experiences and cultural differences
  • 5.2: understand equality legislation and apply it to their practice
  • 5.3: recognise the potential impact of their own values, beliefs and personal biases (which may be unconscious) on practice and take personal action to ensure all service users and carers are treated appropriately with respect and dignity
  • 5.4: understand the duty to make reasonable adjustments in practice and be able to make and support reasonable adjustments in theirs and others’ practice
  • 5.5: recognise the characteristics and consequences of barriers to inclusion, including for socially isolated groups
  • 5.6: actively challenge these barriers, supporting the implementation of change wherever possible
  • 5.7: recognise that regard to equality, diversity and inclusion needs to be embedded in the application of all HCPC standards, across all areas of practice

Expectations of registrants:

  • Registrants are always expected to provide care to all their service users and ensure their specific needs are responded to
  • Registrants should be able to identify when a service user’s care needs to be adjusted because they have a protected characteristic
  • Instead of waiting for a service user to raise the need for accommodations, a registrant should be proactively thinking about how to make the care they offer as accessible as possible

Occupational therapy has roots in social justice, which is key to inclusive ways of working. The royal college of occupational therapists statement on diversity says, 

“The principles of diversity and equality are core to the practice of occupational therapy and are enshrined within the RCOT Code of Ethics. We believe that all people should be treated with dignity and respect, above all as equal members of society with the same choices, rights and privileges. Discrimination and prejudice have no place in our practice and no place in society.”

Royal College of Occupational Therapists

By dismissing the ideas of at least making an effort to reduce your usage of acronyms it could be argued you’re not living up to the standards expected of you.

In conclusion there are many reasons to stop the use of acronyms,  it might feel hard, feel unnecessary,  but we have a responsibility to be clear and inclusive in clinical practise,  by embracing behaviours that foster clear communication ensuring we are understood, can only be a good thing.    

I hope reading this has given you time to reflect,  review your own use of acronyms,  discuss the idea within your teams.  

Join the campaign to change a culture of using terms that only includes those in the know, by saying what you mean, being clear and ensure others understand.  

Share your own thoughts and experiences, feel free to use the graphics below to spread the word, or create your own and share.  

I pledge to stop using acronyms and always use the words; so everyone can be included and have a clearer understanding.

Blog Post, Covid, Occupational Therapy, RCOT

Reflecting on #RCOT2022 Conference Blog post 3 – PLENARY SESSION: My very own “bear hunt”. A journey back from COVID Michael Rosen, children’s author and poet

Acknowledgment – This blog post is a personal opinion piece of initial thoughts after attending conference, with an aim of being a critical friend, often just asking questions I have yet to determine the answer, if indeed there is an answer. This website has an accessible feature, that allows different accessible formats by simply clicking on a button labelled ‘Accessibility Menu’ that appears in green on all pages. It will provide you with a number of options to change the appearance to meet your accessible needs. This communication has been written by a dyslexic person. If you have any trouble with the meaning of any of the sentences or words, please do not be afraid to ask for clarification. I’m #MadeByDyslexia – expect creative thinking & creative spelling.

Micheal Rosen is a children’s author and poet, best known for his book ‘We Are Going On A Bear Hunt’.  He joined the RCOT conference this year to kindly give his account of his recovery journey from Covid 19 that included having to learn to walk again; He has also written a children’s book about this experience called Sticky McStickstick ‘The Friend Who Helped Me Walk Again’.  

We can learn so much from listening to people who have experienced receiving care and the impacted it had. It’s important for services to grow and develop to hear what was good and what was not so great, and address both.   

Regular readers of my blog will know I have my own recovery story from Covid 19 and along hospital stay. Initially I intended to just write about Michael’s journey, however his story made me reflect on mine, parts I have not shared yet, and this has become the focus of this blog post.  

Intensive Care 

Intensive care units (ICUs) are specialist hospital wards that provide treatment and monitoring for people who are very ill. They’re staffed with specially trained healthcare professionals and contain sophisticated monitoring equipment. ICUs are also sometimes called critical care units (CCUs) or intensive therapy units (ITUs). – NHS.UK

Micheal talked about his long induced coma, his lack of memory of this time.  Explaining having to rely on his wife and information written in his ICU diary by staff for him to tell this part.  He touched on the impact of the pandemic on limiting visiting from family,  recalling a time his wife was able to visit in an atrium of the hospital and played videos of his family to help bring him round.  He recalled some therapy input whist here. Using the term therapist thought-out his talk, acknowledging he could not recall who was who during this time.  

When asked if his psychological needs were addressed, he stated at the time I thought yes,  but on refection they’re were gaps.   He reflected on attending a parliamentary review of intensive care, where there was an acknowledgement that more needs to be done to combat the impact of trauma, for those that have lived through an ICU admission. 

My own memories of ICU are mixed up with things I now know were not real, being kidnapped, and using a swimming pool on the roof of the hospital,  there are others I have yet to determine were real, and it is those that have really impacted on my mental health. 

I was very low and suicidal at times.   During my time in ICU I was seen by a psychologist, and later when in a rehab ward had weekly phone-calls with a councillor from liaison psychiatry.  All of which was useful, but after a while I felt it was just getting me to mull over what had happened again and again, rather than find ways to move on. 

In recent months this trauma came back, finding help in the community was so much harder.  A GP who was unfamiliar to me basically said, you had great access in hospital, and left it at that.  

I sought help via my employer,  which did get me seen, assessed and put on a waiting list, for treatment which I am still waiting for.  The assessment process is repetitive, in all access to physiological care and long covid care, I have been asked to complete questionnaires about the state of my mental health.  Which I’m sure are intended as a risk exercise and outcome measure, but this was never followed with any useful treatment,  repetitively being asked about low mood and suicidal thoughts only makes me relive them.  

Reflection  – Throughout my 15 years working as an occupational therapist in mental health,  I have used outcome measures that ask about the negative impact of a persons mental health on their occupational performance.   We would then set goals often in that same session to work on. Talking about your feelings is important, but becoming more proactive and focusing on things you want to achieve just makes more sense. (but I am bias)

Challenge – As occupational therapist we are dual trained,  but perhaps the systems we work in that are diagnostic lead pressures us to forget this?  What could you do differently in your practise to ensure you are addressing both physical and emotional impacts on occupational performance?

General ward and rehab 

Once Michael left ICU he was moved to what he called a geriatric ward –  he stated he did not want to criticise the NHS, but this was not the right place for him.  Later he was send to a rehabilitation ward where he got the help he needed including lots of physio and occupational therapy.  

Micheal talked about the motivation of others to engage in the therapy; using the analogy of school to explain his thinking, and people ‘bunking off’ when describing someone else’s lack of motivation to engage in the therapy.   He reflected a lot about staff and family encouragement, talking about walking again which he said he thought was nice but not possible.   

As he engaged in therapy, his identity became intwined with the equipment he was using.  He talked of being a walking frame person, then a wheelchair person, in his book he says he loved the wheelchair, and was able to move around independently seeing out of the window for the first time.   Followed by a stick person, and eventually able to walk unaided,  touching on a relationship with his walking stick that was positive, even feeling guilty at not needing it and leaving it behind.  In his booked he mentions its there in the hall way just incase.   

Since the presentation I have purchased this book and have read it a number of times with my 4 year old niece Lyra,  who has been a big part of my motivation in my recovery.  We love the book, and would highly recommend.

Although my journey of recovery is much longer than Michael’s, there are similarities.   After ICU I too was sat on a ward that did not meet my needs, whilst waiting for a rehab bed.  Micheal joked about being the opposite to Amy Winehouse, ‘I will go to rehab yes yes yes.’  for me it was ‘I want to go to rehab but the criteria says no no no’  

Sat for months before a bed in a rehab ward was agreed.  I did however have access to therapy, including speech and language, daily physio and occupational therapy, and regular input from a dietitian.  I have very fond memories of this input much of which I have focused on in other blog posts.  As I write this a big smile beams across my face, it was a painful time, but I very much felt cared for and not given up on.  

I have mixed memories and feelings about my time in rehabilitation. It was a neuro-rehabilitation ward, my existing cerebral palsy was what qualified me to meet the criteria, has a neurological condition it was having an impact on my body rebuilding itself from the de-conditioned of a nine month hospital stay.

I had little involvement with occupational therapy when in rehab.  The OT’s mainly worked on the functioning impact of those on the ward with brain injuries. They ran set groups; as treatment sessions, that did not meet my needs.   I was however given some goals, and a quiet space to do some things that I wanted to do, mainly writing for my blog or presentations for conferences of which I did twice from my hospital bed.  Later OT were involved to arrange discharge and the equipment I would need.  

I recall when engaging and listening to the others I shared a bay with; these are the insights I need to remember and take with me as I begin to return to work.  Hearing what people really felt about the therapy they are experiencing.

Like Micheal explianed their were some including me who wanted to ‘bunk off’ the gym occasionally.  Finding the motivation to engage is hard and on refection is often harder than doing the exercises. More could have been done to explore this I feel. Often the other ladies in my bay would express frustrations, of not being listen too, excluded from ward meetings about themselves. As for therapy, time limitations of physio therapy sessions in the Gym, not feeling they were improving,  or disappointed in the exercised done, were very common. I recall an occasion where a nursing assistant, commented on my lack of engagement and not getting out of bed at the weekend. There was no therapy at weekends and due to covid no visiting either, I was unable to leave the ward unaided and the ward did not provide activities. What would you have done?

Others I shared a bay with often didn’t see the point of the groups or tasks they were given by Occupational Therapy. Including a breakfast group, in an ill-equipped kitchen. A quiz group, and being followed walking to the hospital shop.   Of course as occupational therapist we know why an OT might engage people in these tasks,  but what’s missing?  Are we guilty of routine assessments and engagement rather than individualised assessment, goal setting and treatment interventions?

Reflection – The more I reflect, the more I see that criteria to access services and the manufactured environments and tasks we create to engage people, may be a barrier to assessing true occupational performance?  A necessary one at times but something to be mindful of perhaps?

Challenge – Write down what barriers you think your service has. Be creative, (The answer isn’t always just more staff)  Then do something about it.  

I have one more refection to come and will post as I finish it. Please do share your thoughts. I would also recommend checking out RCOT Highlights of conference here . Remember for your continuing professional development its important to evidence you’re learning. One way to does this is to use RCOT’s 5 min reflection tool or even the Equity, Diversity and Belonging reflection tool

Occupational Therapy, RCOT

Reflecting on RCOT Annual Conference 2022 -Blog post 2 – ‘PLENARY SESSION: Levelling the playing field;

Acknowledgment – This blog post is a personal opinion piece of initial thoughts after attending conference, with an aim of being a critical friend, often just asking questions I have yet to determine the answer, if indeed there is an answer. This website has an accessible feature, that allows different accessible formats by simply clicking on a button labelled Accessibility menu that appears in green on all pages. It will provide you with a number of options to change the appearance to meet your accessible needs. This communication has been written by a dyslexic person. If you have any trouble with the meaning of any of the sentences or words, please do not be afraid to ask for clarification. I’m #MadeByDyslexia – expect creative thinking & creative spelling.

‘PLENARY SESSION: Levelling the playing field; Leadership, physical inactivity and occupational therapy with Lyndsey Barrett Director and Lead Occupational Therapist, Sport for Confidence and Dr Chris Whitaker Senior Disability Manager Sport England

Lyndsey shared her own story of recovery and how occupational therapy played an integral part, reflecting on the occupations that were important for her to get back to.  Which lead to developing Sport for Confidence, with a no labels model. 

Lyndsey articulated how she provided occupation focused intervention using sport activities, giving great examples of how these interventions could enhance occupational performance.  For example a swimming session can achieve so many goals, including washing and dressing practise.  What I liked about this is the natural way to assess and develop  skill, rather than a manufactured task for the purpose of assessment, which is often the case within hospital settings. 

Lindsey’s passion and enthusiasm for the profession shone through, and what she has achieved within this non traditional setting is core to what occupational therapy is meant to be.  

Also in this session was Dr Chris Whitaker, Senior Disability Manager, Sport England’. Who talked about his leadership role and what he is doing,  there were many statements that made me think.   He talked about the impact pandemic had it increasing inequalities and barriers for those with disabilities.  

Some take home statements from this session for me were: 

  • Getting people more activity by transformation sport and physical activity to fit in to peoples lives rather than us expected people to fit physical activity in to their lives. 

Reflection – How health care is very much build to suit the needs for those working in it rather than those accessing it.   There is so much to learn here.  

  • Lyndsey talked about inclusive outcome measures are hard to come by, 

Refection on how do we ensure outcome measures are inclusive, co-production and shows the information required.  

  • Lindsey challenged barriers of new ways of managing money the pandemic has created.  Not everyone has access to card payments, online banking as away of paying for things. Cash is important,  touching on the idea that some of that is about skilling people but some is also about understanding that using cash is preferable for some. 

Refection – made me think about my Dad’s reluctance to use self checkouts,  my initial thought was I need to teach him how to use these, because I find them useful,  but that doesn’t mean its right for him.  

Reminded me to set the goals people want rather than what and need rather we think they want and need.

I have more refections to come and will post them as I finish them. Please do share your thoughts. I would also recommend checking out RCOT Highlights of conference here . Also remember for your continuing professional development its important to evidence your learning. One way to does this is to use RCOT’s 5 min reflection tool or even the Equity, Diversity and Belonging reflection tool

Blog Post, Disability, Occupational Therapy, RCOT

Reflecting on Royal College of Occupational Therapists Annual Conference 2022 – Blog 1 The Online Platform.

Acknowledgment –  This blog post is a personal opinion piece of initial thoughts after attending conference, with an aim of being a critical friend, often just asking questions I have yet to determine the answer, if indeed there is an answer. This website has an accessible feature, that allows different accessible formats by simply clicking on a button labelled Accessibility menu that appears in green on all pages. It will provide you with a number of options to change the appearance to meet your accessible needs. This communication has been written by a dyslexic person. If you have any trouble with the meaning of any of the sentences or words, please do not be afraid to ask for clarification. I’m #MadeByDyslexia – expect creative thinking & creative spelling.

Firstly I want to reflect on the platform itself, I did not attend last years conference so I’m unsure how it compares.  This year RCOT conference was held on line over 2 days 14th & 15th June 2022. At a cost of £99 to members less for students. Also regional committees, specialist sections and those in steering groups had access to a small number of free tickets to use as they saw fit. I accessed a free ticket via my region, which was agreed as I was co facilitating a round table event.

Having access before and for 6 months after is great.  Being able to go back at recall a thought – you can’t do that face to face. I was able to familiarise myself with the platform and there was videos to explain how to use everything which was useful.  The headings were clear and I found the site easy to navigate.  

I loved the chat features, being able to see the audiences response as the presentation was happening adds so much richness,  and is something you don’t get in a face to face conference.  I especially loved the green hearts and ability to ask questions throughout the presentations, lest daunting than putting your hand up in a pact room?

Accessibility was thought about, although there is always room for improvement. The ability to have captions really helps me focus on what is being said.

Chat rooms were useful but I wanted the ability to either ask for a subject to be added or create one,  The RCOT hub could have been more interactive to help networking opportunities, as Chair for RCOT North and Yorkshire Committee I would have liked a easy way to connect with any OT’s in the region.  

There is so much a I miss about meeting face to face, the networking, very much the social element of conference as been the reason I have gone back year on year. The ability to focus solely on conference, rather than the distractions of your home or work environment.

But perhaps what is best for the membership to get access to this rich resource, and lets face it in the 40 plus years conference has ran, it has been only been accessed by the same privileged few in positions of power with access to money and time to get away from home and work. I acknowledge here that is not the case for all, and there are many that have attended because of there love for the profession and there for priorities the cost for them. I include myself in this, over the years I have self funded, being funded by my employer or by the college when I have been involved in regional groups.

Someone said to me they would never attend conference, when I asked why, although this person is a practising OT, they did not see this as a place they belonged. I may have been blunt in my description of the usual suspect that often attended year on year, White, middle class women, in leadership roles within the profession or working within academia. (I may have also said with their twin set of pearls)

I say this in the full knowledge of what you see isn’t necessarily what it seems. I know my mother will not mind me using her as an example, by the time she was attending conferences regularly she was in leadership positions with the NHS, a well educated middle class women with a home. Her background however, Born to an Irish father who she lost age 5 and a uneducated working class English mother, growing up in Paddington London in a two room flat, housing 2 children, her mother and grandmother who did not leave her bed, becoming a mother herself at a young age. It wasn’t until her late 20’s that she finial have the means and opportunity to attend university after passing an IQ test. I acknowledge that being white and from a stable family, that supported her gave her privilege.

So why does this person not believe conference is for them?

What is the point of conference?

To allow those with the means to meet up, share ideas, drink wine, enjoy the sun? Trust me for some reason the sun is always shining when its RCOT conference, wether down in Brighton, up in Scotland, near home in Harrogate, or over in Northern Ireland and even this week although on line the sun is out. Someone or thing clearly approves of Occupational Therapy?

Or is the point to make waves, use the research, practise, platform and opportunities conference gives to provide a better experiences for those accessing occupational therapy? Can we really get that from returning to a yearly event held face to face with the same people in attendance?

For me conference has never been accessible for the membership, and why not?

Does a future using online opportunities give us the most inclusive, powerful way to enhance and equipped occupational therapist with the right tools to make change and a difference to those using our services?

A challenge perhaps can this be free to the membership, can you imagine what impact that might have?

I am yet to make my mind up and would love to hear from others.

I have more refections to come and will post them as I finish them. I would also recommend checking out RCOT Highlighted of conference here . Also remember for your continuing professional development its important to evidence your learning. One way to does this is to use RCOT’s 5 min reflection tool or even the Equity, Diversity and Belonging reflection tool